|
Fastest Company
The most
detailed and fair survey of India's B-Schools. Speed, competition,
competence, knowledge, hope.
PREMCHAND
PALETY
According
to quantum physics, the very presence of an observer changes the event
he is observing. Something like that seems to be happening in the
Newtonian world too, as far as the annual Outlook survey of
business schools is concerned. The ranking exercise appears to have
inadvertently triggered off healthy competition between management
institutes to do more research, improve their processes and
facilities.
Sample the statistics. In year 2000, when Outlook did its first
survey of business schools, as many as 70 per cent of the institutes
did not have a single faculty member who had published a research
paper. Now it’s the reverse: in almost 75 per cent of the B-schools
surveyed this year, at least one research paper has been authored by
its faculty. In our ranking we give considerable weightage to
intellectual capital, of which research output forms an important part
(see Methodology). This may not have any immediate impact on
placements, but in the long run are very important for faculty
development, curriculum updation and finally, for the economy as a
whole. If, of course, these research papers are written with the aim
of pursuing and expanding knowledge, and not merely to push the
writer’s B-school up the ranks.
Naturally, placement remains the parameter with the highest weightage
in our judgement. For, the MBA is a professional degree that’s
supposed to prepare young men and women to engage with and master the
real competitive world of corporate life. And it’s unavoidable that
placement performance is judged through the filter of the compensation
packages offered to graduating students. And here, at the risk of
blowing our own trumpet, we can say our methodology has the most
detailed and fair procedure to rank institutes on placement
performance, including a unique return-on-investment index comparing
salaries and school fees.
Several publications now do annual B-school surveys. Some consider
only the average salary offered as a criterion for placement (we take
into account median salary—a more valid indicator than average—and
also maximum and minimum salaries, plus maximum salary for foreign
jobs). Some, startlingly, do not take into account the obvious fact
that schools visited by companies from the US and Europe to hire for
their headquarters are better than those that draw only Indian
recruiters. Others, strangely enough, rely only on perceptions of
recruiters and academics and don’t crunch any hard numbers.
This is galling, since the primary objective of a manager is often
defined as "reducing uncertainty". A perceptual ranking is
nebulous, and can change dramatically if the sample of respondents
changes, or even if the same sample is surveyed at different times.
We also do a perception survey, but we do it as a year-long exercise
to weed out subjectivity as far as possible. Even at the end of this,
we give "perception" only a 20 per cent weightage. The rest
comes from hard numbers supplied to us by the institutes. If some
numbers look exaggerated, we personally visit the schools to verify.
For instance, this year, we were forced to drop some 70 schools from
the survey because of claims that did not match the reality.
This year has been a bumper harvest for the top B-schools as far as
placements go. Many companies had to return empty-handed from the best
campuses. Among the 236 B-schools that participated in our survey, a
high 47 per cent reported that every graduate had got a job
offer—last year it was 38 per cent. The average median annual salary
offered was Rs 2,50,000, up 25 per cent (Rs 50,000) over last year.
And there’s more good news. Areas like industry interface too see
marked improvement.
B-schools across India are ramping up infrastructure, especially
technological.Wireless campuses, electronic databases and libraries,
laptops for every student...these expensive efficiency tools are
becoming common in many private and government-aided autonomous B-schools.Some
like BIMTECH in Delhi, Alliance Business Academy in Bangalore and IIMM
in Pune are in the process of shifting to fully residential campuses.
Another recent positive is the CII initiative to promote industry
interface with B-schools. It has launched a scheme, the CII Industrial
Fellowship, under which a faculty member from a partner institute is
assigned a research project with industry for a period of three to six
months. The academic can get insights into the actual working of the
organisation, get data, do research, develop a case study. Already
institutes like Christ College, Alliance Business Academy, Mount
Carmel Business School have assigned professors to work with
organisations like Wipro and Philips. In the agri-business sector too,
the agriculture ministry’s initiative of generating agricultural
entrepreneurs or agripreneurs—for which Hyderabad’s National
Institute of Agricultural Extension Management is a nodal centre—has
also shown some positive results. There are already over 150 cases of
successful new agripreneurs. Some schools have gone beyond teaching
globalisation; they themselves are venturing abroad into new markets.
Mumbai’s S.P. Jain Institute and Jamshedpur’s XLRI have opened
centres in Dubai. Private universities like the Hyderabad-based ICFAI
are planning to enter Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and other South Asian
countries. The Manipal group now has campuses in Nepal, Malaysia,
Dubai and Muscat. The IIMs are considering opening branches in West
and Southeast Asia. mdi Gurgaon, ICFAI, and Mumbai’s Wellingkar
Institute are applying for international accreditation. by AACSB
(Association of Advanced Collegiate Schools of Business) in the US and
EQUIS (European quality norms).
Now the concerns. Our surveys have consistently shown a big gap
between industry expectations and B-school delivery (see ‘Ticket in
a Bottle’ story on page 54). Many in industry find B-school products
too raw. Says Pankaj Mittal, director, Asia Pacific, Delphi Systems:
"The freshers’ business process understanding is too low and
lacks special skill sets. We have to invest a substantial amount in
training them. B-schools need to inundate students with current cases
and live projects." One reason for this industry-MBA mismatch
could be that over 80 per cent of those who join management institutes
in India come fresh from college and have no work experience. In many
top global schools, a minimum of three years’ work experience is
mandatory for the applicant. Paucity of good faculty is another
problem. About 70,000 students graduate every year from 1,000-odd
B-schools in the country. Taking a 1:10 teacher-student ratio (the
international standard), we need 7,000 teachers. But the current
estimate is less than 2,000 management educators. "And many of
them," says Dr Pandurangarao, director, ICFAI Business School,
"are not properly trained to teach. Very few Indian B-schools are
proactive in developing quality faculty." Agrees Dr A.K. Sen
Gupta, director of Navi Mumbai’s SIES College of Management Studies,
"India produces hardly 150 management doctorates per year,"
he says. Also, teachers are expected to facilitate the process of
learning compared to teaching what they intend to. Teachers are
still considered deliverers of knowledge from ivory towers. The
emotional bondage between teachers and students is virtually non-existent.And
above all, teachers are seldom considered mentors, coaches or
counselors."
Curriculum is another concern. A majority of our B-schools still focus
on existing customers—industries like fmcg, IT, banking,
manufacturing etc—and don’t really think of unserved markets.Only
about ten institutes have programmes on rural management and agri-business
that can generate job producers instead of job consumers.Not a single
institute we surveyed has an elective on growth areas like energy
management or non-renewable energy. They are yet to tap underserved
areas like healthcare, hospitality, communication, entertainment and
small businesses.
"The three vital components of any content and curriculum are
quality, relevance and
flexibility," says Sen Gupta. "Unfortunately, in many
institutes in India, the course content lacks in all the above.
Scarcity of adequate good faculty affects quality. Curriculum has
often been found to be static for as long as a decade. But the most
critical dimension is that the bureaucratic set-up of many B-schools
has resulted in institutes devoid of agility to respond to
change." One consequence of this is that hardly 20 management
institutes in India can be really called integrated B-schools—that
is, truly integrated with industry, and not only disseminating
existing knowledge but creating new knowledge, skills and practices
that can have a far reaching impact on the Indian economy.
Probably the most key concern is the global challenge. The General
Agreement on Trade in Service (GATS) regime, which operates under the
WTO umbrella, is to begin by 2005—opening up global education
markets. While Indian institutes will be free to go abroad and offer
services, top foreign universities will also be allowed entry into
India. In February, International Business Week wrote:
"Schools from the elite University of Chicago to the fast-growing
ranks of ‘for-profit’ colleges are also setting up shop
overseas.... As China and India develop advanced industrial bases the
global demand for post-secondary education could nearly triple over
the next two decades."
Currently, about 10,000 Indians go off every year to study in foreign
B-schools. With barriers falling, this number is bound to swell. And
with the clear possibility of foreign competition coming to India, our
top institutes need to bootstrap themselves urgently to world-class
level. As Professor J. Philip, director, xime Bangalore, says:
"It’s a blurred interconnected borderless world. We have to be
in the thick of it."
(The
author is director, Cfore, which has done this survey for Outlook) |